The persecution of Christians in Egypt has to be considered in connection with the religious policy and the ruler cult of the Roman emperors. Right from the start the Christians, being the followers of what was largely perceived as a Jewish sectarian executed by order of a Roman government representative, looked suspicious to both Romans and orthodox Jews (Vittinghoff, 1984). Notwithstanding their efforts to present themselves as loyal subjects of the Roman state, Christians had been occasionally persecuted since the time of Nero (A.D. 64). But only in the third century did large-scale become a feature of Roman religious policy. They generally aimed at destroying Christian belief and organization rather than the Christians themselves (if the latter could be avoided).

State authorities would try to bring Christians to apostasy and would spare their lives when the defendants sacrificed to the gods of the empire as a gesture of respect to the person of the emperor. State pressure to secure political loyalty through applying the instrument of the ruler cult was often successful, and thus created for the the problem of how to deal later on with those lapsi and apostates wishing to return to the community of the Christian church.

The dissensions on disciplinary measures within the Christian communities led in some cases to serious and long-lasting schisms such as the MELITIAN SCHISM in Egypt, and that of the Donatists in the -speaking provinces of northern Africa. On the other hand, the extraordinary endurance of Christian confessors facing and death made a deep impression not only on believers but also on the noncommitted and the persecutors.

The literary genre of the Acta martyrum and the Passio kept alive and enhanced the memory of the confrontation between Christian confessor and judge, as well as the ordeals of the Christians sentenced, after torture, to the mines or to death (Frend, 1965; Musurillo, 1972). The tombs of the martyrs gave rise to memorial buildings and churches outside the city walls, thereby making a strong impact on the urban features of cities like Rome, Alexandria (Boukolia), and Carthage, and even leading to the development of new centers complete with churches, city dwellings, and accommodations for pilgrims, as was the case at Karm Abu Mena (Krause, 1978).

Ruler Cult and of Christians in Egypt

As the emperors pursued a policy of growing autocracy and religious exaltation of their majesty, Christianity in Egypt took root first in Alexandria, home to a large Jewish community, and later in the Egyptian chora (rural area). There it made converts both in the Greek-speaking “towns” (e.g., the capitals) and in the traditional Egyptian milieu. But the spread of the new belief met with growing resistance, because the Christians, being fiercely monotheistic and rejecting any form of compromise with polytheism, secluded themselves from all public activities involving sacrifice to pagan gods and Roman emperors. This must have been particularly resented in Alexandria, being as it were (and as Philo Legatio ad Gaium 338 states) a real paradigm of ruler cult. The Christians practiced a highly secretive religious life, which gave rise to suspicions that they were culpable of ritual murder and incestuous relations.

While there had already been sporadic actions against Christians in Rome and the provinces (e.g., under Nero, Trajan, Marcus Aurelius), we learn for the first time of in Egypt under the emperor Septimius Severus in 202. Origen’s father, Leonides, was one of the victims. The sojourn of Severus in the East (200 in Egypt) and his special veneration for Serapis may have contributed to this outbreak of anti-Christian feeling, but “the story in the Augustan History that he issued an edict prohibiting the Jews to proselytize and the Christians to make converts is a piece of fiction” (Birley, 1971, p. 209, referring to Scriptores historiae Augustae, vita Severi, 17.1).

Still wider-ranging actions against Christians followed under Decius (249-251). First measures had driven Dionysius, bishop of Alexandria, into flight and hiding. In 250, Decius issued a universal order to sacrifice to the gods, to pour a libation, and to taste sacrificial meat. The penalty for refusal was imprisonment, torture, and death. Those who complied received certificates for the accomplishment of the sacrifices (libelli, well known from Egypt, especially from the Fayyum). In the face of coercion, many capitulated, among them leaders of the church. But others withstood and endured.

The names of seventeen Egyptian martyrs are on record (Frend, 1965, p. 411). After the short reign of Decius and a pause of a few years, resumed in 257 under Valerianus (253-260). Dionysius and members of the Alexandrian clergy were deported to Libya. Others, including Christian laymen, suffered worse fates. But these actions came to a halt in 260, when Valerianus was defeated and captured by the Sassanids of Persia. His son and successor, Gallienus, permitted Christianity to survive unmolested, a policy largely followed until the end of the third century.

During this period, the Egyptian national religion began to decline, the rural areas of the country turning progressively to Christianity but also witnessing the advance of Manichaeism, especially in Upper Egypt. This was also the period that saw the rise of Coptic and the decline of Greek in the chora. However, with the sources at our disposal, we are not able to give a clear picture of the advance of Christianity in the Egyptian hinterland. It has been argued in a forceful and brilliant manner that by 330 half of the Egyptian population had joined the Christian religion and that by the end of the fourth century, “the figure must have been at least ninety percent” (Bagnall, 1982, p. 123). E. Wipszycka (1986), however, has challenged that view with some good arguments. But nobody has ever contested that at least a small percentage of pagans survived into the fifth century. In fact, we hear of monks still fighting paganism in the chora in that century.

Things changed again when Diocletian (284-305) undertook the ideological and political restructuring of the Roman empire. For the sake of discipline and the strengthening of the majority, the emperor and his colleagues in the tetrarchy took measures against Manichaeism (297) and against some recalcitrant Christians in the army. But the martyrdom that the so-called Theban Legion is said to have suffered on Maximian’s orders when about to begin operations against the Bagauds of Gaul, in 286 most probably is not historical, since the specifics of the story cannot confirm the participation of a legionary force from the Thebaid (Van Berchem, 1956; Dupraz, 1961).

The tradition regarding Saint Menas, a Roman soldier first, then a hermit in Asia Minor, and finally a martyr there in the time of Diocletian, also is largely legendary. His body is believed to have been brought to Egypt and have come to rest in what was later called Karm Abu Mena. That place became a famous religious center for several centuries, until the remains of Saint Menas were transferred to Cairo.

The prelude to the Great Persecution began with the triumph of Caesar Galerius over the Persians in 297. His pressure, more than anything else, seems to have determined Diocletian to take action, first on 23 February 303, the feast of the Terminalia. In a crescendo of edicts from 24 February 303 to the fourth edict in January/February 304, ever growing repression was applied to the Christians, leaders and flock alike. In Egypt it was the prefect Clodius Culcianus (301-307) who was responsible for the application of the tetrarchic edicts. The persecution left such a mark on Egyptian Christians that in their time reckoning they used the Era of the Martyrs, starting with the accession of Diocletian to the throne in 284. The Acta of Phileas, bishop of Tmuis, and his Letter refer to Culcianus’ period of office, giving a vivid description of the sufferings of the martyrs at Alexandria (Musurillo, 1972, pp. xlvi- xlviii, 320-53). Phileas was executed probably on 4 February 307.

Neither the abdication of Diocletian and Maximian on 1 May 305 nor Galerius’ edict of toleration on 30 April 311 brought lasting relief for the Christians in Egypt. Maximinus Daia (caesar, 305-310; augustus, 310-313) continued the persecution until Constantine and Licinius met at Milan in 313 and pronounced themselves in favor of the toleration and restoration of the Christian church. Only with Maximinus’ defeat at the hands of Licinius in 313 did the Great Persecution finally come to a halt. In Egypt, Sossianus Hierocles, prefect in 310/311 (Barnes, 1982, p. 150) is on record as a particularly active persecutor.

During his term of office, PETER I, bishop of Alexandria, was executed (25 November 311), and in the Thebaid, Christian eagerness for martyrdom led to fierce antagonism and persecution, of which the bishop and historian Eusebius gives a chilling report (Historia ecclesiastica 8.9). We do not have any reliable data on the number of victims. Frend (1965, p. 537) estimates the number of martyrs in the entire East at between 2,500 and 3,000 in the period of the Great Persecution (303-313).

In 322-323, Licinius, preparing for his struggle with Constantine, resumed the persecution of Christians, but without much success, since he was defeated by 324. Constantine’s victory inaugurated for the whole Roman Empire a new epoch, the “Peace of the Church,” only briefly interrupted by the countermeasures of JULIAN THE APOSTATE (361-363). But peace from persecution did not mean peace within the church. The left a quite varied heritage: on the one side, the memory of the martyrs, on the other, a divided community rife with disciplinary, doctrinal, and personal conflicts.


  • Bagnall, R. S. “Religious and Onomastic Change in Early Byzantine Egypt.” Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 19 (1982):105-123.
  • Barnes, T. D. The New Empire of Diocletian and Constantine. Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1982.
  • Baumeister, T. Martyr Invictus. Der Märtyrer als Sinnbild der Erlösung in der Legende und im Kult der frühen koptischen Kirche. Forschungen zur Volkskunde 46. Münster, 1972.
  • Berchem, D. van. Le Martyre de la légion thébaine. Essai sur la formation d’une legénde. Schweizerische Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 8. Basel, 1956.
  • .    “Des    soldats    chrétiens    dans    la    garde    impériale. Observations sur texte de la Vision de Dorothéos (Papyrus Bodmer XXIX).” Studi classice 24 (1986):155-63.
  • Birley, A. Septimius Severus. The African Emperor. London, 1971. Deckers, J. G. “Die Wandmalerei im Kaiserkultraum von Luxor, mit einem Beitrag von Reinhard Meyer-Graft.” Jahrbuch des Deutschen archäologischen Instituts 94 (1979):600-652.
  • Dupraz, L. Les de S. Maurice d’Agaune. Essai sur l’historicité de la tradition et contribution a l’étude de l’armée pré-dioclétienne (260-286) et des canonisations tardives de la fin du IVe siècle. Studia Friburgensia, n.s. 27. Fribourg, Switzerland, 1961.
  • Frend, W. H. C. Martyrdom and Persecution in the Early Church: A Study of a Conflict from the Maccabees to Donatus. Oxford, 1965.
  • Horn, J. Studien zu den Märtyrern des nördlichen Oberägypten. 1. Märtyrerverehrung und Märtyrerlegenden im Werk des Schenute. Beiträge zur ägyptischen Märtyrerüberlieferung.
  • Göttinger Orientforschungen, ser. 4, Vol. 15. Wiesbaden, 1986.
  • Krause, M. “Karm Abu Mena.” In Reallexikon zur byzantinischen unst. Stuttgart, 1978.
  • Martin, A. “L’Eglise et la khôra égyptienne au IVe siècle.” Revue des études augustiniennes 25 (1979):3-26.
  • Musurillo, H. The Acts of the Christian Martyrs. Introduction, Texts and Translations. Oxford, 1972.
  • Pietersma, A. The Acts of Phileas, Bishop of Thmuis (Including Fragments of the Greek Psalter. P. Beatty XV. With a New Edition of P. Bodmer XX and Halkin’s Acta. Edited with Introduction, and Commentary). d’orientalisme 7. Geneva, 1983.
  • Redde, M. “La Chapelle aux enseignes.” In Le Camp romain de Louqsor (avec une étude des graffites gréco-romains du temple d’Amon), ed. M. el-Saghir et al., pp. 27-31. Mémoires Publiés par les Membres de l’Institut français d’Archéologie orientale du Caire 83. Cairo, 1986. Important for ruler cult under the tetrarchy.
  • Sordi, M. “Dionigio di Alessandria e le vicende della persecuzione di Valeriano in Egitto.” In Paradoxos politeia. Studi patristici in onore di Giuseppe Lazzati, ed. R. Cantalamessa and L. F. Pizzolato. Milan, 1980.
  • Vittinghoff,    F.     “”Christianus     sum’—Das     “Verbrechen’     von Aussenseitern der römischen Gesellschaft.” Historia 33 (1984):331-57.
  • Wipszycka, E. “La Valeur de l’onomastique pour l’histoire de la christianisation de l’Egypte. A propos d’une étude de R. S. Bagnall.” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 62 (1986):173-81.