A bishop of Rome (422-432) and the authority to whom NESTORIUS, bishop of Constantinople, and CYRIL I, bishop of Alexandria, appealed during their controversy over the term THEOTOKOS (430). Celestinus sided with Cyril, and thus caused the condemnation of Nestorius at a held in Rome. The subsequent Council of EPHESUS later deposed him.

Even though the Coptic Historia ecclesiastica and, consequently, the Arabic History of the Patriarchs make absolutely no mention of Celestinus’ decision against Nestorius, in the Coptic tradition he is noted precisely for this action.

From him we possess a collection of eighteen letters in Greek or Latin concerning the Nestorian question. Among the Coptic manuscripts are two homilies, as follows:

  1. Discourse of the Honored Patriarch and Residence of the Holy Ghost, Celestinus, Archbishop of the Metropolis of Rome, in Honor of the Messenger of the Ages of Light, the Archangel Gabriel was meant to be read at the Feast of GABRIEL, 22 Kiyahk. There is a single manuscript, divided between the British Library, London (Or. 7028 and Or. 6780), and the Oriental Institute, Chicago (ed. Worrell, 1923). The text comprises four sections: (1) a homiletic prologue; (2) a treatise in encomiastic form about Gabriel, who is seen as a prefiguration of Christ (here is inserted an invective against Nestorius), and who as such was chosen to announce the conception by Mary; then follows an enumeration of his appearances in the Old Testament (this section may be an elaboration of a preexisting text); (3) the narration of five miracles wrought by Gabriel; and (4) a traditional
  2. The only manuscript of the Pronounced by the Honored Patriarch and True Master, Celestinus, Archbishop of the City of Rome, in Honor of the Martyr . . . Saint Victor is in the British Library (Or. 7022.26-59; ed. Budge, 1914). The text contains a homiletic prologue and a traditional epilogue, between which are inserted three parts: (1) a series of postmortem miracles attributed to the saint, rich in pseudo-historical episodes referring to the emperors Honorius and Constantine; (2) a moral excerpt about the wretchedness of the human condition, which is no more than an excursus extracted from the homily De et corpore (cf. Alexander of Alexandria), and possibly added as an afterthought; and (3) the account of one last miracle. It appears that this particular homily was supposed to accompany as a sequel a true and proper of Victor, such as the surviving one ascribed to Theopemptos of Antioch and CHRYSOSTOM.

In any event, whether these manuscripts contain original versions or later enlargements thereof, they go back to the late period in Coptic literature (seventh to eighth centuries), and were composed directly in Coptic.


  • Budge, E. A. W. Coptic Martyrdoms, pp. 46-101. London, 1914. Worrell, W. H. The Coptic Manuscripts in the Freer Collection, pp. 129-247. New York and London, 1923.